The Journey of Your Article: A Clear Look at ARJST’s Peer Review and Editorial Process

Submitting your work to the Academic Research Journal of Science and Technology (ARJST) means entrusting it to a rigorous and ethical review process. We adhere strictly to the guidelines set by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) for reviewers, ensuring fairness and integrity every step of the way.

Here’s a breakdown of how your article will travel from submission to publication:

1. Initial Screening: The First Check

  • Editorial Review: Our managing editor begins with an initial check to ensure your manuscript:
    • ✅ Follows Journal Guidelines: Meets all formatting and submission requirements.
    • ✅ Is Original: Presents new and unique research.
    • ✅ Upholds Ethical Standards: Complies with academic integrity.
  • Scope and Quality Check: If your article falls outside the journal’s scope or doesn’t meet our quality standards, it may be returned to you without external expert review (desk rejection).

2. Assignment to Peer Reviewers: Expert Evaluation

  • Expert Selection: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two qualified experts in your field.
  • Double-Blind Review: We practice a double-blind review policy. This means:
    • 🤫 Reviewers don’t know who you are.
    • 🤫 You don’t know who the reviewers are. This ensures an unbiased evaluation of your research.

3. Review and Evaluation: The Heart of the Process

  • Comprehensive Assessment: Reviewers will assess your manuscript based on:
    • ✨ Originality: Is the research novel?
    • 🔬 Scientific Rigor: Is the methodology sound and well-executed?
    • ✍️ Clarity: Is the writing clear and easy to understand?
    • 💡 Significance: Do the findings contribute meaningfully to the field?
    • ⚖️ Ethical Compliance: Does the research adhere to ethical principles?
  • Constructive Feedback: Reviewers will provide detailed comments and recommendations, suggesting:
    • 👍 Acceptance: Your paper is ready as is or with minor edits.
    • 🔄 Revision: Your paper needs significant changes based on their feedback.
    • ❌ Rejection: Your paper is not suitable for publication in ARJST.

4. Author Revisions: Shaping Your Work

  • Addressing Feedback: If revisions are requested, you’ll receive the reviewers’ comments. Your task is to:
    • 📝 Revise Thoroughly: Address all comments and concerns raised by the reviewers.
    • 📝 Provide an Explanation: Submit a document detailing how you’ve incorporated the feedback.

5. Copy-Editing and Proofreading: Polishing Your Article

  • Copy-Editing: Once your revised manuscript is accepted, it undergoes a thorough copy-edit to:
    • ✅ Refine Language: Improve grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
    • ✅ Enhance Clarity: Ensure smooth flow and readability.
    • ✅ Standardize Formatting: Maintain consistency throughout the article.
    • ✅ Verify Terminology: Ensure scientific and technical terms are used accurately.
  • Proofreading & Galley Proof:
    • 🧐 Proofreading: We meticulously check for any remaining typographical, grammatical, or formatting errors.
    • 📄 Galley Proof: You’ll receive the final formatted version (galley proof) for your final review.
    • 📬 Your Final Say: You must approve the proof or request minimal corrections within the specified timeframe.

6. Publication: Sharing Your Research

  • Final Approval: Once the galley proof is approved, your article is ready for publication.
  • Pre-Publication Steps: Accepted articles go through final formatting and indexing.
  • Going Live: Your article will be officially published online, ensuring long-term accessibility and visibility within the scientific community.

We are committed to a transparent and efficient process to bring your valuable research to the world.