Journal policies

Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement

ARJST follows the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Last reviewed: October 2026 · ARJST · ISSN 3048-9644 (Online)

Duties of editors

Duties of reviewers

Duties of authors

Authorship and contributorship

Authors are expected to have made a substantial contribution to the conception, design, data, analysis or interpretation of the work; to have drafted or critically revised it; and to approve the final version. Contributions should be described using the CRediT taxonomy. Changes to the author list after submission require the written agreement of all authors.

Conflicts of interest

Authors, reviewers and editors must disclose any financial or personal relationship that could be seen to influence their work. Authors include a competing-interests statement on the title page; “none” must be stated explicitly.

Research ethics and consent

Research involving human participants must have approval from an Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) or equivalent body and the informed consent of participants; the approval reference is given in the methods section. Personal data must be anonymised. Research involving animals must comply with applicable national guidelines.

Data and reproducibility

Authors include a data availability statement and are encouraged to deposit data and code in a public repository. Editors may request raw data during review.

Allegations of misconduct

Plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, image manipulation, duplicate submission, citation manipulation and authorship disputes are investigated following the COPE flowcharts. Authors are given the opportunity to respond. Where necessary the journal may contact the authors’ institution.

Corrections, retractions and expressions of concern

Errors that affect the record are corrected by a published, linked correction notice. Articles with seriously unreliable findings or misconduct are retracted in line with the COPE Retraction Guidelines; the original article remains online, clearly watermarked as retracted. An expression of concern may be issued while an investigation is ongoing.

Complaints and appeals

Complaints about the journal’s processes, editors or published content should be sent to editor@ngmc.ac.in. They are acknowledged within five working days and handled by an editor not involved in the matter; complaints about the Editor-in-Chief are referred to the publisher. Appeals against editorial decisions follow the peer review policy.

Post-publication discussion

Readers may raise comments or concerns about a published article with the editorial office. Substantive comments may be published as a letter, with a reply from the authors.

Intellectual property

Copyright and licensing are described in the copyright & licensing policy. Suspected infringement of intellectual property should be reported to the editorial office.

Publish with ARJST – free of charge

Double-blind peer review, Crossref DOIs and permanent open access. No submission or publication fees.