📜 ARJST Peer Review Policy 📜

✨ Our Core Purpose: The Academic Research Journal of Science and Technology (ARJST) maintains a rigorous peer review process to ensure:

  • ✔️ Quality of research
  • 🛡️ Integrity of content
  • ✅ Credibility of publications

👁️‍🗨️ Our System: We operate a Double-Blind Peer Review system:

  • ✍️ Authors remain anonymous to reviewers.
  • 🕵️ Reviewers remain anonymous to authors.

🧑‍⚖️ The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) Role: The EIC is solely responsible for deciding which articles submitted to ARJST will be published.

💡 EIC Decision Drivers: Publication decisions are always driven by:

  • 🔬 Validation of the work
  • ⬆️ Importance to researchers & readers

➡️ EIC Guidance & Constraints:

  • Guided by: 📋 Journal’s Editorial Board Policies
  • Constrained by: ⚖️ Legal Requirements (e.g., Libel, Copyright, Plagiarism)
  • Based on: 📝 Manuscript Evaluation Reports from Peer Reviewers or Editorial Board Members

✅ Publication Criteria (Manuscript Focus): Decisions to publish are based strictly on the manuscript’s:

  • ✨ Originality
  • ✍️ Writing Clarity
  • ✔️ Validity of Information
  • 🌟 Overall Significance

❌ NOT Based On (Author Focus):

  • 👤 Author’s Personal Attributes
  • 🏫 Author’s Institutional Affiliation